Q: Do you really think Jesus bled from every pore, or do you think it’s symbolic?
A: I believe that Christ DID, in fact, literally bleed from every pore. The reality of this event has been confirmed by the Book of Mormon and other Latter-day scriptures, and modern prophets have also borne witness to the truth of Christ’s bleeding from every pore in the Garden of Gethsemane.
Mosiah 3:7 And lo, he shall suffer temptations, and pain
of body, hunger, thirst, and fatigue, even more than man can suffer, except it
be unto death; for behold, blood cometh from every pore, so great shall be his
anguish for the wickedness and the abominations of his people.
Even Christ himself is recorded bearing witness to the
reality of His suffering in the garden:
D&C 19:17-19 For behold, I, God, have suffered these
things for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent; But if they
would not repent they must suffer even as I;
Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble
because of pain, and to bleed at every
pore, and to suffer both body and spirit—and would that I might not drink
the bitter cup, and shrink—Nevertheless, glory be to the Father, and I partook
and finished my preparations unto the children of men.
It has also been demonstrated scientifically that the human
body can indeed bleed from the pores when subjected to enough stress, as
evidenced by these medical references:
"Those who assert that it is impossible for a body to
sweat blood are not acquainted with the facts. The possibility of this
phenomenon was known to the ancients...And if one will take the trouble to
consult a modern medical dictionary under hemathidrosis or hematidrosis,
reference will be found to the phenomenon. Thus in The American Illustrated
Medical Dictionary (1947, Phila.) we find this entry: 'Hematidrosis—The sweating of blood or of
fluid mixed with blood. In Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary (1955, Phila.)
occurs this reference: Hemathidrosis,
hematidrosis—Condition of sweating blood.'
In a much older medical work we find this interesting note:
'Haematidrosis is a functional disturbance of the sweat apparatus whereby
blood, through diapedesis into the coils and ducts from their surrounding vascular
plexus, becomes mingled with the sweat and appears with it upon the normal
skin, producing the phenomenon of so-called "bloody sweat." It is an
exceedingly rare occurrence, ....' (C. T. Dade in Reference Handbook of the
Medical Sciences, IV, 466. 1902.) Thus
it is clear that the sweating of blood can occur, even if rarely" (Dr.
Sydney B. Sperry, Answers to Book of Mormon Questions, 139-140).
However, physical suffering was only part of what the Savior
experienced during His sojourn in Gethsemane.
“It was not physical pain, nor mental anguish alone, that
caused Him to suffer such torture as to produce an extrusion of blood from
every pore; but a spiritual agony of soul such as only God was capable of
experiencing. No other man, however great his powers of physical or mental
endurance, could have suffered so; for his human organism would have succumbed,
[producing] unconsciousness and welcome oblivion. In that hour of anguish
Christ met and overcame all the horrors that Satan, ‘the prince of this world’
could inflict…In some manner, actual and terribly real though to man
incomprehensible, the Savior took upon Himself the burden of the sins of
mankind from Adam to the end of the world” (James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ, 3rd ed. [1916], 613).
Interestingly enough, the account of Christ’s bleeding from every pore has only survived in one of the four gospel accounts (Luke Ch. 22). The fact that this episode is unique to Luke (in the Bible record) has led some to speculate that he made it up (in order to reinforce the divine nature of Christ in the gentile mind), or that Luke did not record that particular detail at all. Those that hold this last view typically maintain that the verses describing the Lord’s suffering in the garden were added later by designing scribes, or that that they may have been the result of mistranslation, because the verses describing Christ’s suffering in Gethsemane do not appear in all of the oldest Greek copies of the gospel of Luke.
Interestingly enough, the account of Christ’s bleeding from every pore has only survived in one of the four gospel accounts (Luke Ch. 22). The fact that this episode is unique to Luke (in the Bible record) has led some to speculate that he made it up (in order to reinforce the divine nature of Christ in the gentile mind), or that Luke did not record that particular detail at all. Those that hold this last view typically maintain that the verses describing the Lord’s suffering in the garden were added later by designing scribes, or that that they may have been the result of mistranslation, because the verses describing Christ’s suffering in Gethsemane do not appear in all of the oldest Greek copies of the gospel of Luke.
“Some modern Bibles do not include verses 43–44 of Luke 22
because they do not appear in all ancient Greek manuscripts of Luke. Historical
evidence suggests that some scribes in the centuries following the Apostles’
deaths may have removed these verses. The scribes felt embarrassed at the
description of Christ’s agony, which contradicted popular Hellenistic ideals of
emotionless suffering. Such tampering with the biblical text verifies the
testimony of the Book of Mormon prophet Nephi: “They have taken away from the
gospel of the Lamb many parts which are plain and most precious” (1 Nephi
13:26). Latter-day scriptures and prophets affirm the authenticity of what is
recorded in Luke 22:43–44 (see Mosiah 3:7; D&C 19:18)” (New Testament Student Manual, 2014).
Q: If he did bleed from every pore don’t you think there would be accounts of people seeing his clothes covered in blood?
A: It's possible that Luke felt that it was implied and therefore not worth mentioning, but there is another account in scripture that refers to him wearing clothes soaked in blood. In Revelation 19:11-16, when describing Christ’s second coming John mentions that “he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood.” Lest one is inclined to write this off as merely figurative, or (as you mentioned before) entirely symbolic, there is an additional reference to Christ’s appearance at His second coming in D&C section 133:46-48, 50-51:
And it shall be said: Who is this that cometh down from God
in heaven with dyed garments; yea, from the regions which are not known,
clothed in his glorious apparel, traveling in the greatness of his
strength? And he shall say: I am he who
spake in righteousness, mighty to save. And
the Lord shall be red in his apparel, and his garments like him that treadeth
in the wine-vat. And his voice shall
be heard: I have trodden the wine-press alone, and have brought judgment upon
all people; and none were with me; And I have trampled them in my fury, and I
did tread upon them in mine anger, and their blood have I sprinkled upon my
garments, and stained all my raiment; for this was the day of vengeance which
was in my heart.
It is in reference to scriptural prophecies like these that Julia Ward Howe composed these evocative lyrics from her seminal work, "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" (Hymns of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 60).
"Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord;
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;"
It is my opinion that the references to Christ’s blood-soaked garments at His second coming are directly related to the blood that He shed while praying in Gethsemane, and my opinion is supported by a statement made by Elder Neal A. Maxwell:
It is my opinion that the references to Christ’s blood-soaked garments at His second coming are directly related to the blood that He shed while praying in Gethsemane, and my opinion is supported by a statement made by Elder Neal A. Maxwell:
“Having bled at every pore, how red His raiment must have
been in Gethsemane, how crimson that cloak!
No wonder, when Christ comes in power and glory, that He
will come in reminding red attire (see D&C 133:48), signifying not only the
winepress of wrath, but also to bring to our remembrance how He suffered for
each of us in Gethsemane and on Calvary!” (Neal A. Maxwell, “Overcome … Even As
I Also Overcame,” Ensign, May 1987).
There is added significance regarding the symbolism of the
press as it relates to Christ’s suffering in the garden. In the prophecies about the Lord’s second
coming it is common for them to refer to the image of a winepress, wherein
Christ’s garments are stained by our blood, which Christ declares He has “sprinkled
upon [His] garments.”
The Garden of Gethsemane itself has its own notable
connection to another, similar kind of press.
“Gethsemane.—The name means ‘oil-press’ and probably has
reference to a mill maintained at the place for the extraction of oil from the
olives there cultivated” (James E. Talmage, Jesus
the Christ, 3rd ed. [1916], 620).
In an ancient oil-press, the olives would be crushed between
two heavy stones, and when they are first crushed the olives often emit a
liquid which first appears red like blood, before it eventually clears and
becomes more like the olive oil that you or I might see in the store.
Surely, the imagery of crushing grapes and olives, with the
associated crimson release which stains the garments of He who works to press
or crush them is evocative of the unbearable pressure which Christ chose to
undergo that He might take upon himself the sins and stains of the world, with
their associated suffering and misery.
If Christ did not shed blood in Gethsemane in the manner which Luke
describes, then these important scriptural symbols do not make sense.
“What weight is thrown on the scales of pain when
calculating the hurt of innumerable patients in countless hospitals? Now, add
to that the loneliness of the elderly who are forgotten in the rest homes of
society, desperately yearning for a card, a visit, a call—just some recognition
from the outside world. Keep on adding the hurt of hungry children, the
suffering caused by famine, drought, and pestilence. Pile on the heartache of
parents who tearfully plead on a daily basis for a wayward son or daughter to
come back home. Factor in the trauma of every divorce and the tragedy of every
abortion. Add the remorse that comes with each child lost in the dawn of life,
each spouse taken in the prime of marriage. Compound that with the misery of
overflowing prisons, bulging halfway houses and institutions for the mentally
disadvantaged. Multiply all this by century after century of history, and
creation after creation without end. Such is but an awful glimpse of the
Savior’s load. Who can bear such a burden or scale such a mountain as this? No
one, absolutely no one, save Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of us all” (Tad R.
Callister, The Infinite Atonement [2000],
105).
Note: On this same subject, you may also be interested in reading my article Christ and the Healing Power of the Atonement.
Note: On this same subject, you may also be interested in reading my article Christ and the Healing Power of the Atonement.
Q: Is the Mormon focus on the events in
Gethsemane (as a central part of Christ’s atonement) contrary to Biblical
teachings?
A: When
recounting the events of Christ’s atonement many Christian religions tend to
downplay (or overlook) the importance of Gethsemane and the events that took
place there, instead choosing to focus on the agony of the cross and the joy of
the resurrection. While these are
important aspects of the atonement which cannot be neglected, it would be as
great an error to neglect the account of what transpired in the garden of
Gethsemane.
“We speak of
the passion of Jesus Christ. A great many people have an idea that when he was
on the cross, and nails were driven into his hands and feet, that was his great
suffering. His great suffering was before he ever was placed upon the cross. It
was in the Garden of Gethsemane that the blood oozed from the pores of his
body: ‘Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble
because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer both body and
spirit—and would that I might not drink the bitter cup, and shrink’ [D&C
19:18]” (Joseph Fielding Smith, (Doctrines
of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols. [1954–56], 1:130).
It irritates
me when other Christians criticize members of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints for expanding our focus to include Gethsemane, because the
atonement as a whole doesn’t make sense, and the events in Gethsemane make even
less sense, unless one comprehends that the events in Gethsemane constitute the
fulfillment of the Mosaic Law.
Of particular
note is the remarkable account of Christ sweating great drops of blood as he
prayed in anguish in the garden. Many do
nothing more than marvel at the greatness of Christ’s suffering before setting
this strange occurrence aside to focus on other aspects of the atonement.
When Jesus Christ shed great drops of blood in Gethsemane it was not just a religious oddity, rather it was a crucial part of the performance of the crowning ordinance of the atonement and also the fulfillment of the Law of Moses. Paul taught that “almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22).
“Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood. For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people, Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you. Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry” (Hebrews 9:18-21).
“Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood. For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people, Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you. Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry” (Hebrews 9:18-21).
In accordance
with the Law of Moses, the high priest would enter the holy of holies once a
year with the blood of the pure sacrificial lamb to sprinkle upon/before the
mercy seat, which represented the throne and presence of God. The blood was intended to atone for the sins
of the people, including the high priest.
Unfortunately, it was an imperfect offering, made by imperfect mortal men,
and it couldn’t last; moreover the atonement offering was not intended to have
far reaching power, as it was only added as a type in order to point the minds
of the people forward to the time when Christ would come as the great immortal
High Priest to perform the atonement “once for all” (Hebrews 10:10).
Hebrews 9:7
But into the second (the Holy of Holies) went the high priest alone once
every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors
of the people:
Hebrews 7:23
And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue
by reason of death:
Hebrews 7:24
But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable
priesthood. Wherefore he is able also to
save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to
make intercession for them.
Christ, the
great High priest, was the only one capable of giving his life (or shedding his
blood) that would atone for the sins of the people, because only his sacrifice
was sufficiently perfect because he was perfect, and only his sacrifice would
last forever because he was everlasting.
Hebrews 7:26-28
For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled,
separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens; Who needeth not daily, as those high priests,
to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for
this he did once, when he offered up himself.
For the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity; but the word
of the oath, which was since the law, maketh the Son, who is consecrated for
evermore.
Therefore,
when Christ shed his blood in Gethsemane it was a sign of the fulfillment of
the old (oath and) covenant and law, as well of the ushering in of a new and
better covenant.
Hebrews 9:11-15
But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a
greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not
of this building; Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own
blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal
redemption for us. For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an
heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh: How
much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered
himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the
living God? And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by
means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the
first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal
inheritance.
What so many
fail to understand is that the atonement was a priesthood ordinance, and it was
in the garden that Christ began that great and last atonement offering, wherein
he gave his own blood and life to cleanse and sanctify the people, and to “save
them to the uttermost.”
Alma 34:10-16
For it is expedient that there should be a great and last sacrifice;
yea, not a sacrifice of man, neither of beast, neither of any manner of fowl;
for it shall not be a human sacrifice; but it must be an infinite and eternal
sacrifice. Now there is not any man that
can sacrifice his own blood which will atone for the sins of another. Now, if a
man murdereth, behold will our law, which is just, take the life of his brother?
I say unto you, Nay. But the law requireth
the life of him who hath murdered; therefore there can be nothing which is
short of an infinite atonement which will suffice for the sins of the
world. Therefore, it is expedient that
there should be a great and last sacrifice, and then shall there be, or it is
expedient there should be, a stop to the shedding of blood; then shall the law
of Moses be fulfilled; yea, it shall be all fulfilled, every jot and tittle,
and none shall have passed away. And
behold, this is the whole meaning of the law, every whit pointing to that great
and last sacrifice; and that great and last sacrifice will be the Son of God,
yea, infinite and eternal. And thus he
shall bring salvation to all those who shall believe on his name; this being
the intent of this last sacrifice, to bring about the bowels of mercy, which
overpowereth justice, and bringeth about means unto men that they may have
faith unto repentance. And thus mercy
can satisfy the demands of justice, and encircles them in the arms of safety,
while he that exercises no faith unto repentance is exposed to the whole law of
the demands of justice; therefore only unto him that has faith unto repentance
is brought about the great and eternal plan of redemption.
This,
the crowning priesthood ordinance of sanctification, is absolutely crucial to the meaning and
import of Christ’s atonement. Without
the shedding of Christ’s blood we cannot be cleansed of our sins, and without
that we cannot hope to be saved. In
fact, Christ’s whole purpose in giving Himself for us was to purify and to
cleanse us so that He might bring about the salvation of His people.
3 Nephi 27:22
And no unclean thing can enter into his kingdom; therefore nothing
entereth into his rest save it be those who have washed their garments in my
blood, because of their faith, and the repentance of all their sins, and their
faithfulness unto the end.
Titus 2:11-14
For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching
us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly,
righteously, and godly, in this present world; Looking for that blessed hope, and
the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Who gave
himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto
himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.
The atonement
is a thing of incredible complexity and terrible majesty, and the accounts of Christ’s
suffering in Gethsemane contain some of the most harrowing and yet also the
most striking glimpses into the nature and process of the atonement. I believe that if more people understood the
importance and significance of what took place there they might be more likely
to understand their worth in the sight of God.
If we will undertake to make a careful examination, accompanied by thoughtful
meditation, of the Savior’s suffering in Gethsemane, each of us can gain a
deeper understanding of the price which Christ paid to ransom each one of us
from sin and death, and a witness of our own that He did indeed shed his blood
for us in Gethsemane.
“We do not know, we cannot tell, no mortal mind can
conceive, the full import of what Christ did in Gethsemane.
“We know he sweat great gouts of blood from every pore as he
drained the dregs of that bitter cup his Father had given him.
“We know he suffered, both body and spirit, more than it is
possible for man to suffer, except it be unto death.
“We know that in some way, incomprehensible to us, his
suffering satisfied the demands of justice, ransomed penitent souls from the
pains and penalties of sin, and made mercy available to those who believe in his
holy name” (Bruce R. McConkie, “The Purifying Power of Gethsemane,” Ensign, May 1985, 9).
“With what agony of soul He took upon Him now and there the
sins of the world, and in taking expiated them, we may learn from the account
of what passed, when, ‘with strong crying and tears unto Him that was able to
save Him from death,’ He ‘offered up prayers and supplications’ (Heb.
5:7). And—we anticipate it already—with these
results: that he was heard; that He learned obedience by the things which He
suffered; that He was made perfect; and that He became: to us the Author of
Eternal Salvation, and before God, a High-Priest after the order of Melchizedek…Was
there, then, any thought or view of ‘a possibility,’ that Christ’s work could
be accomplished without that hour and Cup?
Or did it only mark the utmost limit of His endurance and
submission? We dare not answer; we only
reverently follow what is recorded” (Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, 846).
Note: Christ assumes more than one symbolic role while performing the atonement. His actions in Gethsemane have further sacrificial significance, because not only was Christ acting as the great High Priest, but He also symbolically represented the sacrificial animal without blemish which would be presented to the priest at the temple as an offering for the sins of the people.
This article is the first in a series. Follow these links for more on the atonement of Jesus Christ:
Note: Christ assumes more than one symbolic role while performing the atonement. His actions in Gethsemane have further sacrificial significance, because not only was Christ acting as the great High Priest, but He also symbolically represented the sacrificial animal without blemish which would be presented to the priest at the temple as an offering for the sins of the people.
“On this night, the Savior had come to Gethsemane to suffer
for the sins of all mankind and work out the infinite Atonement. The garden lay
to the east of the temple in Jerusalem. As outlined in the law of Moses, when
someone desired to make a burnt offering, he selected a “male [animal] without
blemish” and presented it to the priest at the east door of the tabernacle (Leviticus
1:3). During New Testament times, the offering was presented to the priest at
the eastern gate of the temple in Jerusalem. These acts can be seen as a
similitude of the Savior presenting Himself to His Father in the Garden of
Gethsemane” (New Testament Student Manual,
84).
This article is the first in a series. Follow these links for more on the atonement of Jesus Christ:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteWithout recourse to other suffering, we have the simple plot-line that a carpenter was unable to carry a piece of wood. Sound legitimate? But, if we add what happened in Gabbatha (the scourging) to what happened in Gethsemane (the burden of appeasing the sins of all mankind), we can begin to understand why a by-stander (Simon) was needed to carry/drag the cross. I believe that Gethsemane triggered a consumptive coagulopathy. The great miracle is that He kept himself alive until just before the spear pierced His side, and blood AND water gushed out!
ReplyDelete