WARNING: This post contains several mentions of a word and subject which is probably unsuitable for children.
I spend a great deal of time writing, speaking, and answering questions about religion, so I tend to encounter the whole spectrum of doubts and problems (as well as the best that we have to offer) as I get to know people across the world and the church. As I have interacted with other Latter-day Saints on questions of religion, I have noticed a certain tendency that I find especially disturbing. Specifically, I have noticed that some Latter-day Saints like to ask some variation of the “Is [blank] a sin?” question, which is usually accompanied by phrases like “It isn’t expressly forbidden by the general authorities,” or, “it isn’t spelled out in the scriptures (or the policy or manuals of the Church),” with the implication that unless it is spelled out explicitly as a sin, then it must be OK to do. I have also noticed that the same people often also ask about what the minimum requirements are for any given commandment in order to get into heaven, or avoid hell. These individuals tend to be preoccupied with what exactly constitutes a sin in the eyes of God and the church. This attitude can only be called legalism, and it can be very dangerous.
I spend a great deal of time writing, speaking, and answering questions about religion, so I tend to encounter the whole spectrum of doubts and problems (as well as the best that we have to offer) as I get to know people across the world and the church. As I have interacted with other Latter-day Saints on questions of religion, I have noticed a certain tendency that I find especially disturbing. Specifically, I have noticed that some Latter-day Saints like to ask some variation of the “Is [blank] a sin?” question, which is usually accompanied by phrases like “It isn’t expressly forbidden by the general authorities,” or, “it isn’t spelled out in the scriptures (or the policy or manuals of the Church),” with the implication that unless it is spelled out explicitly as a sin, then it must be OK to do. I have also noticed that the same people often also ask about what the minimum requirements are for any given commandment in order to get into heaven, or avoid hell. These individuals tend to be preoccupied with what exactly constitutes a sin in the eyes of God and the church. This attitude can only be called legalism, and it can be very dangerous.
“Legalism: Noun. usage: strict conformity to the letter of the
law rather than its spirit.” (http://thesaurus.infoplease.com/legalism,
n. d.)
Case in point, the following question was posted in a
Facebook discussion group for Latter-day Saints in order to solicit responses for a
podcast:
“I got into a downright weird conversation with someone on
whether or not the LDS Church teaches masturbation as breaking the Law of
Chastity.
His defense was that there isn't a section in the Aaronic
Priesthood Manual or some such work (you know - the Fifth Standard Work) about
masturbation and so it isn't a sin” (Joe Rawlins, Facebook post, April 9, 2015).
In response, one person stated that she has never viewed a
proscription against masturbation to be part of the law growing up, and that
she still doesn’t, and then she posted a link to the Wikipedia definition of
the Law of Chastity (as taught by the LDS church).
Another person posted a talk from President Spencer W.
Kimball which specifically stated that the law of chastity forbids “all sexual
relations outside marriage,” including masturbation, to which the first person
replied that she did not see anything expressly forbidding the practice in the
youth booklet.
Several individuals argued back and forth about whether or
not pornography addiction is an actual or fictional condition, and others made
statements criticizing the church’s stance on the subject as being a relic of Victorian
era hang-ups about sex, and/or misconceptions about the sin of Onan (as it is
often referred to) in the Bible, even going so far as to post a link to an
article from Wiktionary defining onanism (see Genesis chapter 38 if you really
care to know more). There was also a protracted argument among several individuals concerning the severity of the sin, and its ranking in comparison to the severity of certain other sins. Of course the crux
of the entire argument had to do with the fact that teachings forbidding the practice
of masturbation are not clearly spelled out in scripture.
This whole argument is an example of the irritating legalism
that has crept into the attitude of many church members: "If it isn't specifically spelled out,
then I don't have to do it, and if it isn't expressly forbidden then I can do
as I please." Or, more subtly,
ranking or defining sins so that some seem less severe than others, or finding ways to fulfill the bare letter of the law without concern for the spirit of the law. Legalism is a problem for members of the
church because it can cause us to miss the whole point of the gospel (and commandment
keeping) and the atonement of Jesus Christ, and cause us to become lost in a
maze of petty bickering over tiny points of the law. Worse, "by looking beyond the mark" (see Jacob 4:14) we may cause ourselves (and others) to "stumble" and "fall" because of confusion over what is and isn't sin.
Titus 3:8-9 This is a faithful saying, and these things I
will that thou affirm constantly, that they which have believed in God might be
careful to maintain good works. These
things are good and profitable unto men. But avoid foolish questions, and
genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are
unprofitable and vain.
First, a sin, is a sin, is a sin. All sin separates us from
God, therefore there is no meaningful ranking of sin. “For,” as James puts it, "whosoever shall
keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. For he
that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit
no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be
judged by the law of liberty." (see
James 2:10-12)
Under the gospel we live what James calls "the law of
liberty." This means that now that
we have been freed from the onerous burden of trying to remember and keep the
613 rules contained in the law of Moses, we can now obey God in spirit and
truth, and not just according to the letter of the law (which, as Paul points
out in 2 Corinthians 3:6, “killeth”).
Romans 8:1-2 There is therefore now no condemnation to
them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the
Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of
life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
2 Corinthians 3:3, 6 Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be
the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the
Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the
heart. Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the
letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God,
they are the sons of God.
Paul taught (in 2 Corinthians 3) that the law no longer
needs to be written in stone, but rather it must be written in our hearts. Rather than requiring to be carefully
instructed in every little thing that we must do and not do, we are expected to
learn and follow correct principles for ourselves.
Principles Vs. Rules
Principles Vs. Rules
"Well-taught doctrines and principles have a more
powerful influence on behavior than rules" (Dallin H. Oaks, "Gospel
Teaching," Ensign, Nov. 1999, lds.org).
“The Prophet Joseph Smith was asked, “How do you govern so
great and diverse a people as the Latterday Saints?” He replied, “I teach them correct principles
and they govern themselves.” Now, that’s
the order of heaven. That’s how the Almighty operates. That’s how the Church is
supposed to operate. We’re supposed to learn correct principles and then govern
ourselves. We make our own choices, and then we present the matter to the Lord
and get his approving, ratifying seal (Bruce R. McConkie, “Agency or
Inspiration?”, New Era, Jan. 1975, 38–43).
We are not merely expected to learn correct principles and then
left to govern ourselves, however; rather we have been given the gift of the
Holy Ghost, which God gives to us by covenant, and under His guidance we can exercise
our own agency to apply the principles of the Gospel to a wide range of
circumstances and questions.
"A principle is an enduring truth, a law, a rule you
can adopt to guide you in making decisions. Generally principles are not
spelled out in detail. That leaves you free to find your way with an enduring
truth, a principle, as your anchor." (Boyd K Packer,"The Word of Wisdom: The
Principle and the Promises," Ensign,
May 1996, 17).
“Principles are concentrated truth, packaged for application
to a wide variety of circumstances. A true principle makes decisions clear even
under the most confusing and compelling circumstances.” (Richard G. Scott,
"Acquiring Spiritual Knowledge," Ensign,
Nov. 1993, 86).
Note that “Generally principles are not spelled out in
detail.” You may also notice that I have
not bothered to weigh in on the question of whether or not masturbation is a
sin, because the whole point of this article is that you ought to be able to
figure that out for yourself, based on the teachings of the prophets and the Savior,
as well as the promptings of the Holy Ghost.
Having the gospel written in our hearts also pertains directly
to our motives for obeying God’s commandments.
Do we keep the commandments out of fear or compulsion, or for appearances
sake? Are God’s commandments a burden
which we would happily put down if we could?
Keeping the commandments out of some fear that failure to do so will keep you out of heaven, or make you subject to divine punishment or public censure, and not keeping any commandment beyond what you think is necessary to get you into heaven and/or avoid hellfire, is not obedience. Furthermore, doing no more than the bare minimum someone asks you to do is barely compliance. When it comes to gospel principles, such an attitude is certainly not a righteous one.
Keeping the commandments out of some fear that failure to do so will keep you out of heaven, or make you subject to divine punishment or public censure, and not keeping any commandment beyond what you think is necessary to get you into heaven and/or avoid hellfire, is not obedience. Furthermore, doing no more than the bare minimum someone asks you to do is barely compliance. When it comes to gospel principles, such an attitude is certainly not a righteous one.
In a recent conference talk, Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf pointed
out that, in the gospel, we (ideally) keep the commandments as a natural
outgrowth of our love for God. Or in
other words, we ought to keep the commandments without needing to be expressly
told, and we should be able to recognize and avoid evil of our own free will (“The Gift of Grace,” Ensign, May 2015). Unfortunately, there are those who argue semantics, and debate whether or not we are actually required to follow one bit of prophetic counsel or the other, just because it was given as counsel, and not explicitly given the weight of a commandment, or a "Thus saith the Lord" statement.
“Sometimes there are those who argue about words. They might say the prophet gave us counsel but that we are not obliged to follow it unless he says it is a commandment. But the Lord says of the Prophet, “Thou shalt give heed unto all his words and commandments which he shall give unto you.” (D&C 21:4.)” (Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Ezra Taft Benson, (2014), 146–55).
“Sometimes there are those who argue about words. They might say the prophet gave us counsel but that we are not obliged to follow it unless he says it is a commandment. But the Lord says of the Prophet, “Thou shalt give heed unto all his words and commandments which he shall give unto you.” (D&C 21:4.)” (Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Ezra Taft Benson, (2014), 146–55).
This mistake is most common in petty arguments about whether we ought to avoid R-rated movies, or whether or not caffeine drinks are forbidden by the word of wisdom. Arguments that look for ways to overlook or ignore (or at least minimize the importance of) prophetic counsel, just because it was not phrased as a commandment, tend to miss the whole point of learning to obey out of principle, and of our own free will. Furthermore, the Lord has some harsh words for those who wait to be expressly commanded before they will obey.
D&C 58:26-30 For behold, it is not meet that I should
command in all things; for he that is compelled in all things, the same is a
slothful and not a wise servant; wherefore he receiveth no reward. Verily I
say, men should be anxiously engaged in a good cause, and do many things of
their own free will, and bring to pass much righteousness; For the power is in
them, wherein they are agents unto themselves.
And inasmuch as men do good they shall in nowise lose their reward. But
he that doeth not anything until he is commanded, and receiveth a commandment
with doubtful heart, and keepeth it with slothfulness, the same is damned.
Love is the Fulfilling of the Law
In response to a legalistic argument, Christ taught the fundamental truth that all commandment-keeping depends (and all of the commandments depend) on our motivation. It matters what is in our heart when we try to follow a commandment.
Matthew 22:35-40 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Under the law of the gospel, love ought to be our primary motive for being “anxiously engaged in a good cause,” and our reason for doing “many things of [our] own free will, and bring[ing] to pass much righteousness.” It is by love, and not petty legalism and arguments over what is and isn’t commanded or forbidden, that we fulfill the law. If we truly love God, and our fellowman, we would never NEED to have the commandments written in stone before we kept them. Rather, obedience would be the natural fruit and expression of our devotion to God, and our quest to become like Christ.
Love is the Fulfilling of the Law
In response to a legalistic argument, Christ taught the fundamental truth that all commandment-keeping depends (and all of the commandments depend) on our motivation. It matters what is in our heart when we try to follow a commandment.
Matthew 22:35-40 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Under the law of the gospel, love ought to be our primary motive for being “anxiously engaged in a good cause,” and our reason for doing “many things of [our] own free will, and bring[ing] to pass much righteousness.” It is by love, and not petty legalism and arguments over what is and isn’t commanded or forbidden, that we fulfill the law. If we truly love God, and our fellowman, we would never NEED to have the commandments written in stone before we kept them. Rather, obedience would be the natural fruit and expression of our devotion to God, and our quest to become like Christ.
Romans 13:8-10 Owe no man any thing, but to love one
another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery,
Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly
comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as
thyself. Love worketh no ill to his
neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
“‘Love is the fulfilling of the law.’ Did you ever think what [Paul] meant by
that? In those days men were working
their passage into heaven by keeping the Ten Commandments and the hundred and
ten other commandments which they had manufactured out of them. Christ said, I will show you a more simple
way. If you do one thing, you will do
these hundred and ten things, without ever thinking about them. If you love, you will unconsciously fulfill
the whole law. And you can readily see
for yourselves how that must be so. Take
any of the commandments. ‘Thou shalt
have no other Gods before me.’ If a man
love God, you will not require to tell him that. Love is the fulfilling of that law. ‘Take not His name in vain.’ Would he ever dream of taking His name in
vain if he loved Him?…Love would fulfill all these laws regarding God.
[Just] so, if he loved
Man you would never think of telling him to honor his father and mother. He could not do anything else. It would be preposterous to tell him not to
kill. You could only insult him if you
suggested he should not steal--how could he steal from those he loved[?] It would be superfluous to beg him not to
bear false witness against his neighbor.
If he loved him it would be the last thing he would do.
And you would never
dream of urging him not to covet what his neighbor had. He would rather they possessed it than
himself. In this way ‘Love is the
fulfilling of the law.’ It is the rule
for fulfilling all rules, the new commandment for keeping all the old
commandments, Christ’s one secret of the Christian life.” (Henry Drummond, The Greatest Thing in the World, 11-12)
Christian Liberty
The whole point and purpose of God’s plan of happiness, and Christ’s atoning sacrifice is that, out of love for us, the Lord has set us free to choose for ourselves to follow Him, without compulsion. Unfortunately, we also have the freedom to give in to our weaker impulses and to choose (or choose by not choosing) to follow Satan and the ways of sin.
2 Nephi 2:27-28 Wherefore, men are free according to the
flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto man. And they are free to choose liberty and
eternal life, through the great Mediator of all men, or to choose captivity and
death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that
all men might be miserable like unto himself.
And now, my sons, I would that ye should look to the great Mediator, and
hearken unto his great commandments; and be faithful unto his words, and choose
eternal life, according to the will of his Holy Spirit;
We each possess free will, which means that it is up to us
to determine what is right and what is wrong, and which course to take. As I mentioned before, we can have the gift
of the Holy Ghost to aid us in making these decisions, but only if we will
choose to follow Christ from the heart, and not solely according to the letter
of the law. Christ has indeed set us
free, but it is nevertheless our responsibility to exercise that freedom to
choose to submit ourselves and our wills to Him. To choose anything else would only be a
return to bondage.
Galatians 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith
Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
This will require us to search out those principles and
truths which will guide us in “bringing to pass much righteousness.” Where can we find these packets of
concentrated truth which we need to guide us in making correct choices?
“You will find correct principles in the teachings of the
Savior, His prophets, and the scriptures—especially the Book of Mormon."
(Richard G. Scott, Ensign, May 1993,32, 34).
That means that we need to study the scriptures more deeply,
and listen more carefully to the words of the general authorities if we wish to
learn correct principles by which we can govern our actions in any given
situation, with the aid of the Holy Ghost.
As you may be able to tell, I am passionate about this
subject. It distresses me that members
of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who ought to know better,
so often fall into the pointless legalism and petty bickering that unfortunately
characterized many of those who lived under the lesser law. We have been shown “a more excellent way,” by
the light of the gospel and the example of Jesus Christ. Under the gospel we are meant to live the principles which Christ taught from the heart. That means we follow Christ and His gospel out of love for him, and because we genuinely want what he wants, and care about what He cares about. Keeping commandments should proceed naturally out of one's conversion. As disciples of Christ, we ought to focus less on earning heaven and more on learning heaven, by striving to model our life and character on that of the Lord.
At any rate, it is high time that we as a church wake up (and grow up) and shake off the chains of wickedness and letter-only obedience that are holding us back from becoming true saints and disciples of Jesus Christ.
At any rate, it is high time that we as a church wake up (and grow up) and shake off the chains of wickedness and letter-only obedience that are holding us back from becoming true saints and disciples of Jesus Christ.
2 Nephi 1:13, 23 O that ye would awake; awake from a deep
sleep, yea, even from the sleep of hell, and shake off the awful chains by
which ye are bound, which are the chains which bind the children of men, that
they are carried away captive down to the eternal gulf of misery and woe. Awake,
my sons; put on the armor of righteousness.
Shake off the chains with which ye are bound, and come forth out of
obscurity, and arise from the dust.
Romans 13:10-14 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour:
therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. And that, knowing the time, that
now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than
when we believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore
cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. Let us
walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering
and wantonness, not in strife and envying.
But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the
flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.
As I read through some of your posts I find them most helpful. I intend on backtracking and reading your older posts. Great Article.
ReplyDeleteThanks Mark! I'm glad you find my posts to be useful, especially since I know they tend to be fairly long compared with typical internet fare. Feel free to share my posts with your friends!
ReplyDeleteMo laikem tumas mo hemi help hem mi , thank yu tumas long yu we yu post hem post ia.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDelete